Parental leave under scrutiny: is there substance over form?
Keywords:
corporate social responsibility, corporate family responsibility, parental leave, maternity, welfare, people caring, D&I, ItalyAbstract
Purpose. The purpose of this research is to examine how Italian listed companies on the FTSE MIB 40 disclose parental leave policies and employee well-being initiatives in their sustainability reports, with a focus on the reporting years 2017 and 2024. By investigating the extent and nature of such disclosures, the study aims to highlight whether and how firms integrate family-related policies into the broader social pillar of sustainability, thereby contributing to corporate accountability and transparency.
Design/methodology/approach. A longitudinal content analysis was conducted on non-financial reports from FTSE MIB 40 companies for the years 2017 and 2024. The study combined quantitative frequency counts and qualitative assessments to evaluate disclosure practices on parental leave, employee well-being, and gender equality.
Findings. The study shows that disclosures on parental leave and family-support policies have increased between 2017 and 2024, with more companies referencing paternity and aligning with SDG 5. Overall, while transparency and attention to social sustainability have improved, significant gaps persist in the depth, comparability, and substantive integration of parental leave policies within ESG reporting.
Research implications. The study underscores the underdeveloped state of parental leave disclosure in corporate sustainability reporting and stresses the importance of further research into how companies communicate social sustainability practices. It contributes to the literature by bridging regulatory developments, stakeholder expectations, and corporate accountability in the context of employee well-being.
Practical implications. For managers and policymakers, the findings highlight the need to strengthen parental leave policies and ensure their transparent disclosure within ESG frameworks. Firms are encouraged to embed family-support measures into broader people-care strategies, while regulators should promote standardized, comparable reporting that links commitments to measurable outcomes.
Social implications. Strengthening the disclosure of parental leave policies can promote gender equality, support employee well-being, and foster inclusive workplaces. Greater transparency in this area contributes to reducing structural inequalities and advancing progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals.
Originality/value. This study is among the first to examine parental leave disclosure within sustainability reports of Italian listed companies, comparing practices before and after recent EU regulatory reforms. By focusing on the social pillar of ESG, it adds novel insights into Corporate Family Responsibility and highlights how firms integrate (or neglect) employee well-being in their reporting.
Downloads
References
Aazami, S., Shamsuddin, K., & Akmal, S. (2018). Assessment of work–family conflict among women of the sandwich generation. Journal of Adult Development, 25(2), 135-140.
Adema, W., Flutchmann, J., Lloyd, A., & Patrini, V. (2023). Paid parental leave: Big differences for mothers and fathers [Blog post]. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/blogs/2023/01/Paid-parental-leave--Big-differences-for-mothers-and-fathers.html
Ahmad, N., Ullah, Z., Ryu, H. B., Ariza-Montes, A., & Han, H. (2023). From corporate social responsibility to employee well-being: Navigating the pathway to sustainable healthcare. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, Volume 16, 1079–1095. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s398586
Amaral, M. R. do A., Willerding, I. V. A., & Lapolli, É. M. (2023). ESG and sustainability: The impact of the pillar social. Concilium, 23(13), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.53660/clm-1643-23j43
Arditti, J., & Few, A. (2008). Maternal distress and women's reentry into family and community life. Family process, 47(3), 303-321.
Arena, C., & Catuogno, S. (2024). The European Roadmap to Sustainability Reporting: The EFRAG Environmental Standards. In Climate Change and Corporate Reporting in Europe: Standard Setting and Disclosure Practices. (pp. 2-25). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Arendell, T. (2000). Conceiving and investigating motherhood: The decade’s scholarship. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1192–1207.
Baldo, M. D. (2013). Corporate social responsibility, human resource management and corporate family responsibility. When A company is “the best place to work”: Elica group, the hi-life company. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 26(sup1), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2013.11517648
Benjamin, S. J., Botes, V., & Singh, R. (2024). Fulfilling stakeholders’ demand: Exploring CSR assurance’s contribution to firms’ environmental and social disclosures. Business Strategy & Development, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.329
Beretta, V., Demartini, M. C., Lico, L., & Trucco, S. (2021). A tone analysis of the non-financial disclosure in the automotive industry. Sustainability, 13(4), 2132. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042132
Beretta, V., Demartini, M. C., & Trucco, S. (2024). From sustainability to financial performance: The role of SDG disclosure. Measuring Business Excellence, 29(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-05-2024-0054
Blom, R., Jaspers, E., Knies, E., & van der Lippe, T. (2025). Family-friendly policies and workplace supports: A meta-analysis of their effects on career, job, and work-family outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 157, 104091.
Brescia, V., Oppioli, M., Degregori, G., & Santoro, G. (2025). Bridging diversity management and intellectual capital: insights and impacts in healthcare organizations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 26(2), 281-303.
Ciccia, R., & Verloo, M. (2012). Parental leave regulations and the persistence of the male breadwinner model: Using fuzzy-set ideal type analysis to assess gender equality in an enlarged Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(5), 507–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712456576
Cismaș, L. M., Boțoteanu, G. I., Cojocaru, T. M., & Gruescu, R. M. (2023). Significance of corporate non-financial information disclosure for sustainable economic growth. Journal of Green Economy and Low-Carbon Development, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.56578/jgelcd020101
Chafi, M. B., Hultberg, A., & Bozic Yams, N. (2021). Post-pandemic office work: Perceived challenges and opportunities for a sustainable work environment. Sustainability, 14(1), 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010294
Clatworthy, M., & Jones, M. J. (2001). The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report readability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(3), 311-326.
Confetto, M. G., Ključnikov, A., Covucci, C., & Normando, M. (2023). Diversity and inclusion in employer branding: An explorative analysis of European companies’ digital communication. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 45(7), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/er-11-2022-0522
Costantini, A., Dickert, S., Sartori, R., & Ceschi, A. (2020). Return to work after maternity leave: The role of support policies on work attitudes of women in management positions. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 36(1), 108–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-06-2019-0085
Demartini, M. C., Beretta, V., & Larisch, A. (2024). Does the transparency of sustainability reports matter? A quantitative assessment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(1), 18–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2926
Deriu, P., Ciavarella, A., Di Stefano, G., Fabbiani, I., Pierantoni, L., Poli, T. N., Quaresima, G., & Ronchini, B. (2024). (Rapporto 2024 sulla rendicontazione non finanziaria delle società quotate italiane) Report 2024 on Non-Financial Reporting of Italian Listed Companies SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5006067
DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Isomorphism in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160. 10.2307/2095101.
Dolcini, M., Brambilla, A., Gola, M., & Capolongo, S. (2023). Health and well-being key performance indicators in corporate sustainability disclosure. A review of sustainability reports from a sample of major European companies. Acta Biomedica Atenei Parmensis, 94(S3), e2023132–e2023132. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14334
Dottori, D., Modena, F., & Tanzi, G. M. (2024). Peer effects in parental leave: Evidence from Italy. Labour Economics, 89, 102600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102600
Duvander, A.-Z., Arnalds, Á. A., Lammi-Taskula, J., Rostgaard, T., Eydal, G. B., Gíslason, I. V., Kvande, E., Bungum, B., & Håkansson, H. (2025). Paid parental leave and social sustainability in the Nordic countries. TemaNord. https://doi.org/10.6027/temanord2025-547
Earle, A., Raub, A., Sprague, A., & Heymann, J. (2023). Progress towards gender equality in paid parental leave: An analysis of legislation in 193 countries from 1995–2022. Community, Work & Family, 28(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2226809
European Commission. (2023). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards. Official Journal of the European Union, L 281, 1–284.
European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2019). Gender Equality Index 2019: Work-life balance (Publication No. 978-92-9482-382-3; DOI: 10.2839/319154) [PDF]. EIGE.
Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2013). Effect of stakeholders’ pressure on transparency of sustainability reports within the GRI framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1748-5
Fondazione Vigorelli (2025). A View into Corporate Family Responsibility of Companies and Benefits of its Practice A study with HR support. Quaderni FMV n.2/2025.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Heymann, J., Sprague, A. R., Nandi, A., Earle, A., Batra, P., Schickedanz, A., Chung, P. J., & Raub, A. (2017). Paid parental leave and family wellbeing in the sustainable development era. Public Health Reviews, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-017-0067-2
Heshmati, A., Honkaniemi, H., & Juárez, S. P. (2023). The effect of parental leave on parents’ mental health: a systematic review. The Lancet Public Health, 8(1), e57-e75.
Hopkins, J., & Bardoel, A. (2023). The future is hybrid: How organisations are designing and supporting sustainable hybrid work models in post-pandemic Australia. Sustainability, 15(4), 3086. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043086
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2025). Closing the gender gap in paid parental leaves: Better parental leaves for a more caring world of work. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/publications/closing-gender-gap-paid-parental-leaves-better-parental-leaves-more-caring
Istat (2017). La salute riproduttiva della donna, Roma.
Istituto Nazionale Previdenza Sociale (INPS). (2024). Prestazioni per congedi a tutela della maternità e paternità [Benefits for maternity and paternity leave]. https://www.inps.it/it/en/inps-comunica/diritti-e-obblighi-in-materia-di-sicurezza-sociale-nell-unione-e/per-i-cittadini/prestazioni-per-congedi-a-tutela-della-maternit--e-paternit.html#:~:text=1.,which%20the%20allowance%20period%20begins.
Johansson, T., & Klinth, R. (2008). Caring fathers. Men and Masculinities, 11(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184x06291899
Kaufman, G., & Petts, R. J. (2020). Gendered parental leave policies among Fortune 500 companies. Community, Work & Family, 25(5), 603–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2020.1804324
Kuo, L., Kuo, P.-W., & Chen, C.-C. (2021). Mandatory CSR disclosure, CSR assurance, and the cost of debt capital: Evidence from Taiwan. Sustainability, 13(4), 1768. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041768
Lanzalonga, F., Petrolo, B., Chmet, F., & Brescia, V. (2023). Exploring diversity management to avoid social washing and pinkwashing: using bibliometric analysis to shape future research directions. Journal of Intercultural Management, 15(1), 41-65.
Martinčević, I., Primorac, D., & Dorić, B. (2024). Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD): Obligations, challenges and requirements for companies. ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, 10(1), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.54820/entrenova-2024-0026
Moore, S. (2025). A View into Corporate Family Responsibility of Companies and Benefits of its Practice (Quaderni FMV, n. 2/2025). Milano: Fondazione Marco Vigorelli. Available at https://www.marcovigorelli.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Quaderno2-2025.pdf
Nguyen, T. T. D. (2020). The relationship between board of directors and sustainability reporting: An empirical study in German large listed firms. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 68(1), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun202068010211
O’Brien, M., & Uzunalioglu, M. (2022). Parenting leave policies and a global social policy agenda. In Research Handbook on Leave Policy (pp. 67–81). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800372214.00015
O'Brien, M., & Wall, K. (2017). Comparative perspectives on work-life balance and gender equality: Fathers on leave alone (p. 266). Springer Nature.
Pierret, C. R. (2006). The sandwich generation: Women caring for parents and children. Monthly Lab. Rev., 129, 3.
Rahman, S. (2012). Impression management motivations, strategies and disclosure credibility of corporate narratives. Journal of Management Research, 4(3), 1.
Raub, A., & Heymann, J. (2021). Progress in National Policies Supporting the Sustainable Development Goals: Policies that Matter to Income and Its Impact on Health. Annual Review of Public Health, 42(1), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094151
Ray, R., Gornick, J. C., & Schmitt, J. (2009). Parental leave policies in 21 countries: Assessing generosity and gender equality (Report). Center for Economic and Policy Research.
Rosati, F., & Faria, L. G. D. (2019). Addressing the SDGs in sustainability reports: The relationship with institutional factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 1312–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.107
Save the Children Italia. (2022). Le equilibriste: la maternità in Italia 2022 [Annual report]. Save the Children Italia. Retrieved from https://www.savethechildren.it/cosa facciamo/pubblicazioni/le-equilibriste-la-maternita-in-italia-2022
Save the Children. (2025, 17 marzo). Congedo di paternità: più di 3 padri su 5 lo utilizzano. Available at : https://www.savethechildren.it/blog-notizie/congedo-di-paternita-piu-di-3-padri-su-5-lo-utilizzano?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Seierstad, C., & Gabaldon, P., & Mensi-Klarbach, H. (2017). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom: Volume 2: Multiple Approaches Beyond Quotas. Springer.
Sharma, R. (2025). Unveiling the effects of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) on company sustainability reporting practices: A case of German companies. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-01-2025-0091
Sherwood, M. W., & Pollard, J. L. (2017). The risk-adjusted return potential of integrating ESG strategies into emerging market equities. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 8(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2017.1331118
Spiteri, G., & Xuereb, R. B. (2012). Going back to work after childbirth: women’s lived experiences. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 30(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2012.693153
Staniškienė, E., & Stankevičiūtė, Ž. (2018). Social sustainability measurement framework: The case of employee perspective in a CSR-committed organisation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 708–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.269
Tomaselli, G. (2019). Corporate Family Responsibility as a Driver for Entrepreneurial Success.
In: Farache, F., Grigore, G., Stancu, A., McQueen, D. (eds) Responsible People. Palgrave
Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10740-6_3
Tomassini, C., & Lamura, G. (2009). Population ageing in Italy and southern Europe. In International handbook of population aging (pp. 69-89). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Van Bommel, H. M., Hubers, F., & Maas, K. E. H. (2023). Prominent themes and blind spots in diversity and inclusion literature: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 192(3), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05522-w
Vohra, V., Singh, S. & Dutta, T. Embracing Flexibility Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Flexible Working Arrangements Using the SCM-TBFO Framework. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 25, 1–26 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-023-00366-9
Xiang, N., Whitehouse, G., Tomaszewski, W., & Martin, B. (2022). The benefits and penalties of formal and informal flexible working-time arrangements: evidence from a cohort study of Australian mothers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(14), 2939-2960.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 European journal of volunteering and community-based projects
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Funding data
-
NextGenerationEU
Grant numbers 2022YALETF - CUP F53D23003200006
